Clinical trials on nutraceutical products are increasingly widespread and their promotion is becoming a vital asset for achieving market success. However, not all clinical trials are created equal. What are the factors that make a trial “good”?
Consumers are becoming more educated and proactive when deciding which nutraceutical products to buy. They are increasingly paying attention to proof of efficacy. With big pharma brands stepping into nutraceuticals, the rules are shifting, and clinical substantiation’s importance is increasing rapidly even on the finished products.
How do we distinguish good clinical trials from the rest?
The factors that determine a good clinical trial are:
Watch the video or continue reading to find out more.
Also important and adding to credibility:
A good clinical trial meticulously plans its statistics in advance – from sample size to anticipated effects. This precision is crucial for obtaining results than are not only relevant but also open to a meaningful interpretation.
Principles, such as control group, double blinding, and randomization are important to establish causality, control for placebo responses and other nonspecific effects, and reduce selection bias. Moreover, when designing a clinical trial, one should also consider maintaining the product formulation, dosage, and format for solid substantiation.
Next, consider the chosen population. Food supplements are designed for everyday use, not for treating disease symptoms. Therefore, clinical studies on nutraceutical products should focus on individuals with a moderate deficiency or problem. The higher the deficiency, the faster or more pronounced the effects (of supplementation), but these are less relevant in terms of everyday use for consumers who suffer from a moderate deficiency.
GCP refers to internationally recognized standards that guide how clinical studies are planned and conducted. Although mandatory for pharmaceutical clinical trials, GCP is not legally required for nutraceutical studies but is widely regarded as the gold standard for high-quality clinical research. Studies that follow GCP are designed to protect participants’ safety and rights, and to ensure that every step of the study is anticipated, traceable, and well documented and the results reliable and trustworthy.
The desire is for things to be as thoroughly described as possible. To know which methods were used in the study and to have enough general data about what happened during the study so that one can replicate the study themselves.
When it comes to sharing results, it is advisable to be in line with the CONSORT guidelines for reporting the results of clinical trials. In practice, this means that when you’re preparing an article, you systematically follow the checklist and present outcomes in a clean, transparent, and complete manner. Optimal transparency and minimal risk of bias are achieved when the sources of funding and independence of the research team are clearly stated.
In summary, a good clinical trial on nutraceutical products involves a blend of statistical precision, thoughtful population selection, meticulous documentation, adherence to study standards, and transparency in reporting. As the world of food supplements evolves, these criteria become the cornerstone for building trust and credibility in the eyes of both consumers and industry experts.
Updated January 23rd 2026
"*" indicates required fields
Oops! We could not locate your form.
"*" indicates required fields
WHY OUR PRODUCTS
By Indication
